NCPDSOA.COM

Superior Officers Association

Police Department of Nassau County, New York

 

Police Department County of Nassau, New York

Superior Officers Association Police Department of Nassau County, New York -  

Superior Officers Association Police Department of Nassau County, New York

 
  Home
 
 
 
 
 
  Attorney's Message
  Office Secretary
  Trustees
  Retirees
  History of the S.O.A.
 
  Upcoming Functions
 
  Contact Us
  Merchandise for Sale
  Vacation Discount Tickets
  Advertise with Us
  Photos
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

 

 
   


Brian Hoesl,  First Vice President
E-mail: Nassoa@aol.com

Superior Officers Association Police Department of Nassau County, New York

 

Precinct Consolidation

 

If you had told me 5 years ago we would be eliminating four of our precincts in a large consolidation plan I would have told you that you were crazy.  I guess with the present county administration anything can now be considered possible.  It is like they sold the public the "Brooklyn Bridge"!  The scenario goes like this: we will take a large modern metropolitan police department which once had 4000 police officers, of which over 500 were supervisors, operating out of eight local precincts, shrink them down to 2300 officers with 320 supervisors operating out of 4 grossly oversized precincts, and we will deliver the same services as before.  Don't believe it?  Well I find it hard to believe that the general public, or for that matter the county administration, can actually believe that claim.  In a County of 1.3 million residents that means each precinct will contain approximately 300,000 people. Even if you factor in the Village departments, I am sure the number is approaching one-quarter of a million residents per precinct.  In comparison, if you take the population of NYC (8 Million) and divide it into their 76 precincts you can see their precinct size would probably average around 100,000 residents per command.  Yet our administration claims that we will continue to deliver quality services to every community in each command even with these staffing numbers.  At a time when burglaries are skyrocketing in the county, things can only get worse.  It is a perfect recipe for increased crime.  All the factors are there: poor economy, high gold prices, no cops,  and unemployment and entitlement benefit cuts.  Just like the late 1970's, the scenario for more home break ins and street robberies is here.  When will the public see through this and demand that the county stop the dismantlement of this department?  

 

So why embark upon this consolidation?  It is not about efficiency or because each police car is a "mini police precinct" on wheels as claimed, it is about decimating the ranks of the SOA to save money.  Make no mistake about it, since we are the high wage earners, this consolidation came on our backs.  None of the other unions have suffered as we did.  The only goal in this plan was to eliminate police supervisors.  This coming at the same time our new Commissioner is stating that his goal is to increase supervision and hold supervisors strictly accountable.  Yet the Commissioner publicly stated that he endorses this plan.  How does that work?   You eliminate over 40 supervisors and your goal is to increase supervision?  Is that written somewhere in Iannone's book on police supervision?  This coming when our numbers are at an all time low, probably about the supervisory level we had during the 1940's!   More and more commands will operate, including the new community centers, with absolutely no supervisors present.  But if there is a problem somewhere they will look for a supervisor to blame it on, that I am sure of.   Just remember the example of Lt. William Calley from the My Lai incident in Vietnam, of the 14 officers charged, right up to the Major General, only the 2nd Lt. was convicted.  They always need a scapegoat!

 

And just decreasing our numbers will not be enough.  We are prepared to proceed if they violate our MOA's on flying, vacation picks, days off, etc.  We feel that we are in a good position to challenge any violations of these agreements and we will file grievances as they occur.  It is going to be a whole new round of labor unrest that will not end for some time.  All because the Legislature, controlled by the Republicans, refuse to raise much needed revenue, through even a minimal tax increase.  When does it stop, when they declare bankruptcy?   I wonder if the public would have voted themselves a $10/month tax increase to save the precincts had they put this up for a referendum like the Coliseum deal.  I know that, as a county resident, I would have definitely voted for it! 

 

Legislation Update – Albany               

 

The newest development this year in Albany is the passage of Tier VI for all members hired after April 1, 2012.  While any new police officer the County hires will be a Tier VI member, they will be a non-contributory member if hired before the expiration of our contract on December 31, 2015.  This means that all the provisions of Tier VI will apply to them except the mandatory contributions to the pension plan.  Only members hired after the expiration of the contract will have to contribute.  The reason for this is that the PBA contract contains the provision that all members will be in a non-contributory pension plan and the provisions in Tier V, which were not changed in TierVI, exempt any new hire from the contributory part if hired under an existing contract that provides this benefit.  I am sure the framers of Tier V never envisioned a contract lasting as long as ours does, but nevertheless this is one occasion where our multi-year contract paid off for any new hires.  However, one can only guess, given the County's fiscal situation, when any new hiring will actually occur.

 

I gave you a brief overview of the new Tier in an email sent to members, but I will repeat the highlights here. While I can't say any of us on the Legislative Committee were overjoyed by the outcome, the time we spend in Albany did pay off.  The fact that we were able to hold onto the most important parts of our pension plan, that being a defined benefit plan with 20 year retirement, made our lobbying efforts worthwhile.  Members of the Republican Senate and the Democratic Assembly both played a large role in helping us with these revisions to the Governor's original plan, and I firmly believe that the Governor only agreed to these items because of the support we have in both houses. 

 

Here is a recap of the bill as presently written:

 

1) The major components of the bill are effective April 1, 2012. 

2) New employees in the police and fire retirement system will contribute between 3% and 6 % of salary toward their pension, based on their yearly rate.  The increases range from 3% for those making less than $45,000 to 6% for those making more than $100,000.

3) The final average salary will now be based on a five year average.

4) Overtime will count but there is a 10% cap for pension purposes, this however should be better than Tier V because it is based on total earnings whereas the 15% cap in Tier V is based on base salary.

5) No earnings over $179,000.00 will be included in pension calculations. The cap is based on the current Governor's salary.  This will be an issue as time goes on.  The problem is that the Governor's salary has not been increased in 10 years, and lets face facts, it could be another 10 years before it is increased.  Look at the Nassau County Legislators who still make $39,000 a year because they are always reluctant to face public criticism over increasing their compensation.  While it is not a problem today, the provision that links someone's pension to another person's salary seems to be a stretch and I am sure we will have to deal with this years down the road.

6) Increase the Military Buy-Back from 3% to 6% of salary for each year purchased.  Not an effective way of saying thanks to our veterans.

7) 20 Year retirement and 10 year vesting were retained.

 

The provisions omitted from the final version of the Governor's original bill were the 401K plan, a contribution plan based on the performance of the fund, 12 year vesting, no overtime inclusion in FAS, and the removal of a minimum contribution rate for employers.

 

As a side note, the NYC Police & Fire were not included in most parts of this plan and they will retain their Tier III system which was put in place in 2009.  They did get an improvement in disability pensions which will go to 50% of salary (from 44% in original Tier III bill), but they will now have 5 year pension average like Tier VI.  Their Tier III has greater contribution rates than our system,  and the social security offset at age 62.  For those reason I believe that our new Tier VI is actually the better plan, although neither compares to the benefits that we all enjoy presently.

 

Most Importantly, as I have stated numerous times before, no provisions of this plan will be applied to any current employees. 

 

While I will not say this was a great victory for us, at least we walked away with enough of the pension intact to still attract quality people to our profession.  When Tier II was instituted it contained only a 60% disability option and a 66% FAS, both of which we improved by our lobbying efforts in Albany.  The improvements to 75% disability and 70% FAS, along with other "sweeteners", as the Governor likes to call them, to Tier II are what your Legislative Committee does in Albany.  We will continue to try and improve all of our pension plans as we move forward.

 

As always, any questions on any of the above items please call me at the office or email me at nassoa@aol.com

 


 

 

Legislation Update – Albany

 The first time I headed onto the New York State Thruway for the ride to Albany as your legislative representative was 10 years ago.  Back in 2002 we approached each session with plans on how to improve our benefits from the previous year. How quickly times change!  In recent years, with the unjustified onslaught against pubic employee compensation, we find ourselves concentrating on retaining what we have and preventing any erosion to existing benefits.  This year will be no exception as the Governor opened the session with his State of the State address, in which he declared his intention to drastically change the retirement system as we know it.

 It was only two years ago that we were faced with the establishment of the Tier V pension plan for all state employees.  When originally introduced it was devastating.  However, we were able to negotiate many changes that softened the blow.  While Tier V saw the establishment for the first time of a contributory plan for the Police and Fire System, we were able to maintain most of the other benefits from Tier II.  Tier VI is much worse.

 To give you an idea of how drastic a change the Governor is proposing consider these provisions of the new plan:

     1)     Final average salary based on your last 5 years (from current 3 years)

2)     No overtime included in FAS

3)     Introduction of a 401K style plan as an option for state employees (Police and Fire would have no disability or line of duty death benefits under a 401K plan) 

4)     Employee contribution rate of between 4% and 6%, however if the employer rate goes over 14% of salary (as it is now) the employee must make up half the difference with no cap

5)     Take out the minimum contribution rate of 4.5% for employers (not having this in place in the past is the reason their rate is so high now – so much for learning from past mistakes)

6)     Increase by-back for military service from 3% to 6% of salary

7)     Surprisingly the 20 year plan for Police and Fire was kept, we were fully expecting a 25 year plan to be proposed.  I guess with all the above cuts there was no need for further savings.

8)     Cap on all pensions of $179,000 (the Governor’s salary).  Is this a plan to boost his salary or an ego thing, as the Governor’s salary hasn’t been raised in over 10 years?  So maybe this is only a negotiating tactic, I hope so!  I guess it is another way to get at all those school superintendent salaries he often complains about because as stated below this is well above the average P&F pension in this state.

 

Sound like something you would like to trade your pension in for?  I think not.  But unfortunately the business community and the media will not be happy until they entirely gut your pension plan.  They ignore the fact that the average NYS employee pension is $19,000 a year, with the average Police/Fire pension at $39,000 a year.  The simple truth is this, 30 years ago 84% of US workers at medium to large US companies received a defined benefit pension the same as we do, yet today that figure is only 30%.  The rest of the world now relies on 401K style plans, something that were originally started as savings plans to supplement a pension.  They were never designed to replace a pension but business leaders soon found out they could save millions by replacing their employees’ plan with a 401K, and the money they save could go into their pocket.  So here we are in 2012, and most of the public took a bath with their plans in the recent economic downturn.  Business leaders now point to public sector worker’s pensions and insinuate that these expenses are what are ruining the economy.   After all, if they get us to accept a 401K plan then their own employees will stop asking them for a defined benefit plan. Unfortunately many politicians are jumping on the bandwagon because of a slanted publicity campaign by business/media groups that is attempting to sway public opinion against us.  As one example of this the “Committee to Save New York”, a group of very rich businessmen (you know, the ones who pay 14% in income taxes), have spent a record $14 million on lobbying and advertising this year to help promote the Governor’s agenda which they hope will eventually put more money in their pockets as opposed to yours, not to mention the huge fees that are generated by 401K plans for the investment groups.  We have our work cut out for us and will strive to keep our benefits intact so as to not  ruin this job for future generations.  The people that came before us helped make this job as good as it is today, I believe it is our duty to continue the fight.

 

The Governor's decision to put the above Tier VI proposal into the budget was intentionally done to force Legislators to deal with this issue before the April 1st budget deadline.  That, unfortunately, does not give us much time.  We have meetings set up next week with the Governor’s counsel to go over key provisions of the bill.  We have already started to meet with Legislative leaders to voice our opposition; hopefully we will be able to make some headway to minimize the damage.

 

We also have our full agenda of bills that we propose every year as well as some new issues we will address.  Listed below are some of the newer bills that I have not mentioned before.  They will cover the following topics:

 

1)     A bill to grandfather in members who received a permanent partial disability status from Worker’s Comp before December of 2010, and now are being denied chiropractic or physical therapy treatment as originally guaranteed due to recent rule changes.

2)     A bill to provide a ¾ disability pension for members on active military duty who are wounded and unable to return to work (we previously passed a bill for members killed in action that gave them the same death benefits as if they suffered a LOD death, but as of now there is no provision for a ¾ disability pension).

3)     A bill to protect police officers from harassment on the Internet for actions taken in connection with their official duties. 

4)     A bill to prevent an Internet data base from publishing names and addresses of police officers in regards to salary or pistol permits.

5)     A bill to mandate the issuance of a pistol permit to a retired police officer without unnecessary delay, which seems to be a problem in some upstate communities by local sheriff’s offices.

 

State of the County

 What is new with the County?  Well, to put it briefly, as of this writing nothing is new.  I know the PBA has been having constant discussions with them in order to see if there is any room for compromise in settling this pay freeze dispute but so far nothing has happened.  By the time you read this article that might have all changed but it doesn’t look overly promising.  But you can never tell, perhaps NIFA and the County will come to their senses and work something out but it seems like we might be just waiting for the outcome of our lawsuit.  I think our position closely parallels the PBA’s so we will have to see if they make any progress. 

 As always, any questions on any of the above items please call me at the office or email me at nassoa@aol.com

 

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Election Endorsements and Union Rally

 First I would like to thank all of our members, both active and retired, who showed up at the recent labor rally to protest the introduction of the “Nassau County Fiscal Crisis Reform Act”.  The mere thought of this law is so egregious to all union members that people from all over the state showed up to demonstrate their opposition.  I want to thank our brothers and sisters in the union movement (fire, corrections, teachers, and CSEA) for their attendance, especially the police unions that showed up from NYPD, Suffolk PD, NYS Troopers, Port Authority PD, MTA PD, as well various village, city, and town departments from Nassau and Suffolk.  It was heartwarming to see the support we received and are very happy that we can count on over one million public sector employees throughout the state to support us in this battle with our County Executive. 

 Moving on to the upcoming election, I am sure that you have all received by now our PEC newsletter in the mail with our recommendations for the County Legislature and other local races.  These selections are repeated here in this issue of the Gold Shield along with those of the Suffolk SOA for our members residing out east.  We hope that you will consider our choices and vote on Nov. 8th. 

 I imagine the one glaring difference in our endorsements from prior elections is the fact that we were unable to endorse any of the Republican Legislators running except for one.  The reason was quite simple; it was the issue of police layoffs and the Fiscal Crisis Reform Act.  We could not bring ourselves to endorse anyone who would even consider layoffs at the present time, nor anyone who would vote for unconstitutional laws.  The simple fact regarding layoffs is this: the NCPD, during the mid 1970’s, hit our highest staffing levels when we employed approximately 3900 sworn members. Our head count today stands at 2390!  This department has been cut nearly in half because of budget constraints.  When does the Legislature admit that we are at our lowest possible staffing level?  Any police officer on this job can answer that question; we are there now!  Only the Democratic candidates and one Republican, Joe Belesi, stood up for what was right and told us that they would not lay off police officers at these staffing levels.

 So what other options has the County Executive put forward?  Top on the list is the “Fiscal Crisis Reform Act”, a law to give the County Executive the power to throw out contacts when he declares a fiscal crisis. The mere suggestion of this was enough to bring thousands of demonstrators from all over the state to the front lawn of the County Legislative Building last week.  If the County Executive truly believes that this bill is constitutional he should get it passed so we can start the battle.  The end result will be the waste of more taxpayer dollars on lawsuits, as he did with the re-districting lawsuit and the Coliseum election.  Unfortunately his other suggestions include closing precincts, laying off CSEA workers, and selling County property.  These options will only result in the public receiving fewer services than they do now.  People hate high taxes, but tax them without delivering good services and they are really going to be upset.

 Many of the Republican candidates were friends whom we had supported in the past, and it was a difficult decision to go against them now.  However, it is the leaders of their delegation putting forth these options and when they don’t stand up to disagree with them we have to assume that they agree with this nonsense.  Solidarity is great; just make sure the people you are following know what they are doing!  The mantra of the Republican Party nationwide has seemed to evolve into “the fiscal crisis is all the public employees’ fault”, while discounting all other government spending.  We had hoped the Nassau Republicans were above this but, led by the County Executive, this appears to be their position.  Sooner or later I believe that the Republicans will realize that they are turning off many blue-collar workers who had supported them in the past.  To me the most extreme example of this is that the Republicans, who always touted themselves as the law and order party, would be willing to rip up contracts that were legally negotiated.  What happened to abiding by the law of the land?  It is very disappointing to me that someone would throw out their core beliefs in order to save their job.  The one thing I admire about the Democrats is that they are not afraid to buck their own party if they do not believe in the message.  Maybe this is something that the Republicans need to learn.  All this being said we have told the County Executive, time and time again, that we were willing to work with him to get them through the rough times.  But we are unwilling to be the only solution to a problem that we did not create, and when he finally becomes reasonable we are more than willing to listen.  Unfortunately, as the rhetoric heats up, it will become more difficult than ever to come to terms.  It took years with our last County Executive, who used the same tactic of negotiating contracts in the press, to realize this does not work.  Maybe we need to tone down those press releases Ed!  

 Please review our endorsements and we ask you and your family members to seriously consider our choices and vote on Election Day.  This is one election that you cannot afford to sit out!

 Legislation Update - Albany

 Here is a quick update for you on our bills that were passed during the 2011 session that I had no disposition for in the last Gold Shield report.  Of the ten major pieces sent to the Governor’s desk we managed to get nine signed into law, an outcome that we were obviously very pleased with.  In addition to the four reported signed in my last report here are the results:

 

1) S5651/A7834         Retirement notice 30-15 days – Changes the minimum filing time required to submit your retirement papers to the state from 30 days to 15 – signed by Governor on 8/3/11 Chapter 375

 

2) S5653/A5744A      NYPD 20 year guarantee – Guarantees NYPD members their pension after 20 years except for felony conviction for crimes related to their employment – signed by Governor on 9/23/11 Chapter 514 – big win for the NYPD members.                                             

 

3) S5658/A8456A       Black Powder Bill – adds black powder firearms to the list of firearms prohibited for possession by felons (the NY State Police have had two Troopers recently killed         by felons armed with black powder rifles) – signed by Governor on 8/3/11 Chapter 357                

 

4) S5234A/A7751A    Califano memorial bridge – names the L.I.E. overpass near the site of P.O. Michael Califano’s death in his name – signed by Governor on 8/3/11 Chapter 312

 

5) S5837/A7605A       Tier V pre tax contributions – changes contributions by Tier V members to pre-tax dollars, they are currently deducted post tax.  This change gives them equity with all other pension plans that require contributions – signed by Governor on 9/23/11 Chapter 525

 

6) S5098/ A4954         Civil service health insurance guarantee - guarantees your health insurance when out on a line of duty injury – Vetoed by the Governor, veto message 60.  This was our one major disappointment.  We will continue to work on this bill next year.

 

As always, any questions on any of the above items please call me at the office or email me at nassoa@aol.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   



  HELPFUL LINKS FOR UP-TO-DATE
LEGISLATION

 http://www.senate.state.ny.us/

  http://assembly.state.ny.us/ 

  http://sobb.com/states/newyork/nylinks.html

 http://www.state.ny.us/

Superior Officers Association Police Department of Nassau County, New York

Home |President's Message| 1st Vice President's Message | 2nd Vice President's Message | Treasurer's Message | Recording Secretary's Message | Attorney's Message | Office Secretary | Trustees | Retirees| History of the S.O.A. | Legislation | Upcoming Functions | Bulletin Board | Contact Us | Merchandise for Sale | Vacation Discount Tickets | Advertise with Us | Photos

© Superior Officers Association
Police Department of Nassau County, NY